Hey @prius would it be possible to get the frequency of a problem as a tag in anki? This would make it a lot easier to prioritise canonical problems.

Thanks I really love this tool!

Hi @prius, tried to generate and got this error:

test ! "x/Users/user/Downloads/leetcode-anki/leetcode-anki" = "x" || (echo "Need to run inside venv" && exit 1) pip install -r requirements.txt Requirement already satisfied: python-leetcode in ./leetcode-anki/lib/python3.9/site-packages (from -r requirements.txt (line 1)) (1.0.6) Requirement already satisfied: diskcache in ./leetcode-anki/lib/python3.9/site-packages (from -r requirements.txt (line 2)) (5.2.1) Requirement already satisfied: genanki in ./leetcode-anki/lib/python3.9/site-packages (from -r requirements.txt (line 3)) (0.11.0) Requirement already satisfied: tqdm in ./leetcode-anki/lib/python3.9/site-packages (from -r requirements.txt (line 4)) (4.62.3) Requirement already satisfied: certifi in ./leetcode-anki/lib/python3.9/site-packages (from python-leetcode->-r requirements.txt (line 1)) (2021.10.8) Requirement already satisfied: urllib3>=1.15 in ./leetcode-anki/lib/python3.9/site-packages (from python-leetcode->-r requirements.txt (line 1)) (1.26.7) Requirement already satisfied: python-dateutil in ./leetcode-anki/lib/python3.9/site-packages (from python-leetcode->-r requirements.txt (line 1)) (2.8.2) Requirement already satisfied: six>=1.10 in ./leetcode-anki/lib/python3.9/site-packages (from python-leetcode->-r requirements.txt (line 1)) (1.16.0) Requirement already satisfied: cached-property in ./leetcode-anki/lib/python3.9/site-packages (from genanki->-r requirements.txt (line 3)) (1.5.2) Requirement already satisfied: pyyaml in ./leetcode-anki/lib/python3.9/site-packages (from genanki->-r requirements.txt (line 3)) (6.0) Requirement already satisfied: frozendict in ./leetcode-anki/lib/python3.9/site-packages (from genanki->-r requirements.txt (line 3)) (2.0.6) Requirement already satisfied: pystache in ./leetcode-anki/lib/python3.9/site-packages (from genanki->-r requirements.txt (line 3)) (0.5.0) python3 generate.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/user/Downloads/leetcode-anki/generate.py", line 14, in import genanki # type: ignore File "/Users/user/Downloads/leetcode-anki/leetcode-anki/lib/python3.9/site-packages/genanki/init.py", line 6, in from .model import Model File "/Users/user/Downloads/leetcode-anki/leetcode-anki/lib/python3.9/site-packages/genanki/model.py", line 3, in import pystache File "/Users/user/Downloads/leetcode-anki/leetcode-anki/lib/python3.9/site-packages/pystache/init.py", line 2, in from init import * ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'init' make: *** [generate] Error 1

I've found the most helpful thing for me so far is using curated/organized lists, like this one.

I started manually making cards and it is a pain, so your tool seems great! But I am concerned if Anki is just going to randomly throw all 25XX problems at me, it won't be as effective.

Is there any way (via this or in Anki) to encourage/constrain the cards or their ordering?

For a small subset of questions, the generated cards don't capture the question content but instead, have the Content field being No content.

For instance, problem 2340 has such an issue deterministically, while problem 2341 always shows up fine.

Some Leetcode questions with Content field being no content:

• 2339
• 2340
• 2345
• 2346
• 2355
• 2356
• 2361
• 2362
• ...

It is possible to issue batch requests to the leetcode API. The current method is super slow. There are graphql queries that allow you to fetch many problems at once. But they should be implemented in the python-leetcode library first.

Seems your latest changes to the leetcode-api broke the leetcode-anki generation.

Also had another issue where I didn't get any content from leetcode I think which broke the Anki-generation (since the return was None and not a str.

Fixed here.

Let me know what you think.

Thanks for this package!!

    @pytest.mark.asyncio
    @mock.patch(
        "leetcode_anki.helpers.leetcode.LeetcodeData._get_problems_data",
        mock.Mock(return_value=[QUESTION_DETAIL]),
    )
    async def test_tags(self) -> None:
        self._leetcode_data._cache["test"] = QUESTION_DETAIL
    
>       assert (await self._leetcode_data.tags("test")) == ["test-tag"]
E       AssertionError: assert ['test-tag', 'Hard'] == ['test-tag']
E         Left contains one more item: 'Hard'
E         Use -v to get more diff

test/helpers/test_leetcode.py:248: AssertionError

This is due to logic change

Leetcode responses got too large. As a result users are experiencing problem with running the script, because leetcode API fails to return such big results. This diff adds an ability to limit number of problems, downloaded in parallel and limits it to 1000 problems by default.

With the new batch leetcode API, the generation is now down from 80 minutes to 4 minutes. Also, no longer cache is needed because it is relatively cheap to fetch all the problems from leetcode.

• Added Travis CI configuration, so the package is now built automatically on commit
• Made the code async so cached cards will be generated faster
• Switched to PyPi package version

This repo is really awesome and just what I was doing for myself. I just have a question about adding my own solutions to the "back" card. I managed to add the field but it's not the back. And I don't see the discuss and solutions card.. could you help me with this?

Leetcode return tehre are 2052 cards, but we get 2051 in the end. It is either a bug with the way we calculate pages and offsets, or leetcode really returns incorrect number of problems. Have to investigate

[email protected] [venv:leetcode-anki] leetcode-anki $ time ipython3 --pdb -- generate.py                            
INFO:root:Fetching 2052 problems 50 per page                                                                          
100%|████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████| 2100/2100 [04:37<00:00,  7.58problem/s]
INFO:root:Generating flashcards                            
100%|███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████| 2051/2051 [00:00<00:00, 28815.78flashcard/s]
                                                                                                                      
real    4m41.243s                                                                                                     
user    0m3.262s                                           
sys     0m0.440s                                                                                                      

I set the sort field to 3 digits string at the moment: https://github.com/prius/leetcode-anki/blob/master/generate.py#L298

But the sorting is still incorrect.

For example, there are 15 cards for which sorting by the sort field gives the following order:

012
010
025
011
023
006
002
035
008
033
036
037
037
011
048

So effective there is no sorting.

I guess I need to look at Anki's source code to understand how it uses this field.